Jun 10 2009
∞
“ And Nesson, as he has tried to do repeatedly before, recorded the proceedings — at least until Judge Davis told him to stop (after plaintiffs’ counsel Timothy Reynolds alerted the court to the possibility that Nesson might be recording). Nesson later blogged that he believes he’s in the right, though “there may be a problem under massachusetts law.” (That “problem” is Mass. Gen. L. ch. 272 ยง 99, which makes it a felony punishable by five years in state prison to record a telephone conversation without the consent of all participants, or to “disclose” that recording. I don’t see any exception that allows you to record until someone tells you to knock it off.)
—
Would I even have this blog without Nesson and these two cases? I doubt it.
